Coleman, Chizuco v. U.S. Trustee's Office et al
| Chizuco Coleman |
| U.S. Trustee's Office, Spenta Enterprises, Inc. and Hoshang R. Karani |
| 3:2014cv00880 |
| December 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| James D. Peterson |
| Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER: The bankruptcy appeal is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 3/26/2015. (kwf)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER: The Colemans have 14 days to notify the court whether they intend to pursue these appeals. If the court does not receive a response from both Robert Coleman and Chizuco Coleman within the deadline, these appeals will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 3/11/2015. (kwf)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER denying 12 Motion to Dismiss; denying 16 Motion to Dismiss. Attorney Needler may have until March 2, 2015, to provide the court with an update on the status of his representation in this case. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 2/20/2015. (kwf)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER that plaintiffs-appellants Robert Coleman and Chizuco Coleman's Emergency Motions to Stay, (dkt. 3 in case number 14-cv-879 and dkt. 3 in case number 14-cv-880) are DENIED. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/29/2014. (nln)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
