Crowley, Timothy v. Stun-Tech Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Timothy Crowley
Defendant: Stun-Tech Inc., Karvons Arms, Stinger Systems, Inc., Electronic Defense Technologies LLC and R.A.C.C. Industries Inc.
Case Number: 3:2015cv00006
Filed: January 5, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
County: Dane
Presiding Judge: William M. Conley
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 36 JUDGMENT entered dismissing the case. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 1/9/2018. (jef),(ps)
November 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER that Attorney Casper is DISCHARGED, subject to providing a copy of this order to plaintiff. Plaintiff shall have until December 20, 2017, to show cause why this case should not be dismissed in its entirety. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 11/20/2017. (jef),(ps)
June 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER entering attorney Timothy Casper's appearance for plaintiff for the limited purpose of assisting plaintiff with drafting an amended complaint. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 6/22/2016. (jef),(ps)
May 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER granting 22 motion for assistance in recruiting volunteer counsel. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 5/11/2016. (jef),(ps)
February 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER that plaintiff may have until March 1, 2016, to notify the court whether he intends to name Stuntronics and any other company as defendants. If plaintiff chooses to name one or more new defendants, he must also include all facts reasonably kn own that would establish each defendant's citizenship for the purpose of determining federal diversity jurisdiction. If it becomes clear that subject matter jurisdiction exists, the court will then revisit plaintiff's motion for assistance in recruiting counsel. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/1/2016. (jef),(ps)
September 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying 7 Motion for Assistance in Recruiting Counsel; denying 9 Motion for assistance or leeway in filing an amended complaint. Plaintiff has until September 29, 2015, to file an amended complaint containing good faith allegations as t o the citizenship of all parties in this case and/or to show that he has made a good faith effort to retain counsel on his own as set forth within this order. Failure to do so will result in a prompt dismissal of this action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 9/8/2015. (jef),(ps)
May 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER that plaintiff Timothy Crowley has until June 8, 2015, to file an amended complaint containing good faith allegations as to the citizenship of all parties in this case. Failure to do so will result in a prompt dismissal of this action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 5/08/2015. (nln),(ps)
January 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 12.62 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 2/13/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 1/23/2015. (jef),(ps)
January 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff to submit $400 filing fee or motion and trust fund account statement. Fee or Trust Fund Account Statement due 1/30/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 1/7/2015. (jef),(ps)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crowley, Timothy v. Stun-Tech Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Crowley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stun-Tech Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karvons Arms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stinger Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Electronic Defense Technologies LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R.A.C.C. Industries Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?