United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Holzhueter, Loren et al
United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
Loren W. Holzhueter, ISC, Inc. and Honefi, LLC |
3:2015cv00045 |
January 21, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Jefferson |
Stephen L. Crocker |
James D. Peterson |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 414 ORDER granting 408 Receiver Michael Polsky's quarterly motion for fees. Polsky may have until February 23, 2018, to file a supplement to his quarterly report. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 2/9/18. (jat) |
Filing 383 ORDER regarding 9/5/2017 telephone status conference. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 9/5/17. (jat) |
Filing 382 OPINION & ORDER: Objections 304 , 313 , 326 , 319 are overruled. Motion for attorney fees 314 is denied. The receiver's proposed phase II distribution plan 299 is adopted. Motion for reconsideration 307 is denied. Motion to stay 376 is withdrawn as moot per dkt. 380 . The phase II distribution is STAYED pending appeal. Motion for declaratory relief 346 is deferred. Telephonic status conference is set for 9/5/2017 at 10:00 AM to schedule an evidentiary hearing. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 8/30/17. (jat) |
Filing 366 ORDER granting 351 Quarterly Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 8/11/17. (jat) |
Filing 292 ORDER APPROVING SALE OF SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF THE ASSETS OF ISC, INC. AND HONEFI LLC FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS, CLAIMS AND ENCUMBRANCES Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 5/25/17. (jat) |
Filing 268 ORDER regarding 259 Quarterly Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 5/8/17. (jat) |
Filing 245 ORDER denying 239 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 3/9/17. (jat) |
Filing 231 ORDER: The clerk of court shall release $9,564,140.36 in principal and $17,626.51 in interest held in the court' registry. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/20/16. (jat) |
Filing 203 ORDER denying 197 Motion to Intervene for purposes of appeal. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 11/7/16. (jat) |
Filing 196 ORDER APPOINTING RECEIVER Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/20/16. (jat) |
Filing 147 ORDER: The state court plaintiffs' motion to unseal 137 is DENIED as moot. The state court plaintiffs' motion to be heard on the proposed settlements in this case is GRANTED. The state court plaintiffs may respond to the proposed settlements no later than July 8, 2016. The SEC, defendants, and relief defendants may reply no later than July 15, 2016. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 6/23/16. (jat) |
Filing 129 OPINION & ORDER denying 87 Motion to Stay State Court Proceedings. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 4/7/16. (jat) |
Filing 81 CONSENT JUDGMENT AS TO THE ESTATE OF LOREN HOLZHUETER Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 11/2/2015. (jat) |
Filing 36 ORDER ON PAYMENT: The SEC's objection, Dkt. 32 , is OVERRULED, and partial payment of $13,500 to Kravit, Hovel & Krawczyk, S.C., is approved. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 3/27/15. (jat) |
Filing 26 ORDER for Accounting. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 2/12/15. (jat) |
Filing 20 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/28/15. (jat) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.