Oxbo International Corporation v. H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc.
| Oxbo International Corporation |
| H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc. |
| 3:2015cv00292 |
| May 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Wood |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| James D. Peterson |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
551
PERMANENT INJUNCTION. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 8/3/2017. (arw)
|
|
Filing
472
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 06/07/2017. (ejt)
|
|
Filing
392
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 115 Motion for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Oxbo International Corporation; granting in part and denying in part 122 Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc.; granting i n part and denying in part 148 Motion to Strike Declaration and Expert Report by Defendant H&S Manufacturing Company ; denying as moot 163 Motion to Strike by Counter Defendant Oxbo International Corporation ; denying 197 Motion to Supplemen t by Plaintiff Oxbo International Corporation; granting 222 Motion to Strike by Plaintiff Oxbo International Corporation ; denying 291 Motion to Strike by Counter Defendant Oxbo International Corporation. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 5/23/2017. (voc)
|
|
Filing
389
NOTICE OF TENTATIVE RULINGS granting in part and denying in part 115 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 122 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 148 Motion to Strike; denying 197 Motion to Supplement; denying 222 Motion to Strike; denying 291 Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 5/19/2017. (arw)
|
|
Filing
225
ORDER. The court has reviewed plaintiff's opposition to defendant's motion for leave to file a sur-reply. Dkt. 224 . The court will allow defendant a sur-reply. Defendant made a substantial late document production, and to alleviate the pr ejudice to plaintiff, the court allowed plaintiff to supplement its expert reports and summary judgment submissions. See Dkt. 181. The court expected that defendant would ask for the opportunity to respond. Id. By allowing the sur-reply, the court is not rewarding defendant for its late production. But the court wants full briefing on the merits of the issues to which the late-produced documents might be relevant. That said, the court has no intention of allowing defendant to capitalize on the s ituation by making new arguments in its sur-reply. At this point, the court sees no need for the in-person hearing that the court had provisionally scheduled for Friday, November 4, 2016. But the parties may have until 5:00 p.m. today to ask the court to keep the hearing on the calendar. Any such request should explain to the court why the hearing is needed. The court will let the parties know if the hearing is on by noon tomorrow. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 11/2/2016. (voc)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER granting 34 Joint MOTION TO DISMISS Counts IX and X of Defendant's Amended Counterclaims ; denying 67 Motion for Sanctions Against H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 8/19/2016. (voc)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER GRANTING 39 Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff's Second Amended Preliminary Infringement Contentions and DENYING 57 Motion for Hearing or for Leave to File a Reply. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 04/02/2016. (jdp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Oxbo International Corporation v. H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Oxbo International Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Richard Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
