Watkins, Renaldo v. Hannifen, Dan et al
| Renaldo Abdul Watkins |
| Dan Hannifen, Renee Watkins and Tim Sullivan |
| 3:2015cv00573 |
| September 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Eau Claire |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| James D. Peterson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
JUDGMENT entered dismissing this case for plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER that plaintiff is DENIED leave to proceed against defendant Jon Theisen, who is dismissed from this case. Plaintiff is DENIED leave to proceed on his claims against defendants Dan Hannifen, Renee Watkins, and Tim Sullivan, and the complaint, Dk t. 1 , is DISMISSED for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. Plaintiff may have until November 2, 2015, to file an amended complaint that provides a short and plain statement of a claim against these defendants. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/19/2015. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees is granted. Plaintiff's complaint is taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 9/11/2015. (elc),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
