Reas-Mendez, Jose v. Boughton, Gary et al
Jose A. Reas-Mendez |
Gary Boughton and Jerome Sweeney |
3:2015cv00746 |
November 19, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Chippewa |
William M. Conley |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case for plaintiff Jose A. Reas-Mendez's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 6/13/2017. (jef/cc: plaintiff via U.S. mail),(ps) |
Filing 16 ORDER that plaintiff Jose Reas-Mendez may have until June 2, 2017, to amend his complaint to correct the deficiencies described in this opinion. Defendants, Gary Boughton and Jermone Sweeney, are DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 5/23/2017. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 8 ORDER denying 6 Motion for Use of Release Account Funds to pay the remainder of the filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 12/22/2015. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 5 ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 143.64 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 12/24/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 12/3/2015. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 3 ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff to submit Trust fund account statement. Trust Fund Account Statement due 12/10/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 11/20/2015. (jef),(ps) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.