Rogers, Jermaine v. Ashworth, John et al
| Jermaine Rogers |
| John Ashworth, Bittelman, Kotta, Neumaire, Mike Meisner, Schneider and Christensen |
| 3:2015cv00765 |
| November 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Grant |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER that plaintiff Jermaine Rogers's claim against defendant C.O. Christensen is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment closing this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/12/2018. (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 82 Motions in Limine. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/5/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER denying plaintiff's 17 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part defendants' 35 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 11/13/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 50.30 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 1/4/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 12/11/2015. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff to submit trust fund account statement. Trust Fund Account Statement due 12/23/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 12/1/2015. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
