Homelsey, Charles v. Dittman, Michael
| Charles J. Homelsey aka Charles J. Mayberry |
| Michael Dittman |
| 3:2016cv00047 |
| January 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Columbia |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER denying petitioner's 49 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 9/6/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER granting 37 Motion for Certificate of Appealability; granting 41 , 47 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Petitioner may have until May 19, 2017, in which to submit a check or money order made payable to the clerk of court in the amount of $76.89. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 5/3/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
35
JUDGMENT entered granting respondent Michael Dittman's motion to dismiss and dismissing the case. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 2/24/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER that the parties may have until July 1, 2016, to confer and then inform the court whether respondent Michael Dittman will renew his motion to dismiss and, if so, what the appropriate briefing schedule should be. If the parties cannot agree on a proposed schedule, each party should submit his own proposal, along with his reasons for choosing that schedule. If the parties do not respond by July 1, 2016, I will direct respondent to file an answer to the petition and set a schedule for briefing the merits of the petition. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 6/16/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting request by petitioner Charles Homelsey a/ka Charles Mayberry for assistance in recruiting counsel. Petitioner's "motion for an evidentiary hearing into continuing harassment," dkt. # 16 , is DENIED as moot. All remai ning deadlines are STRICKEN pending recruitment of counsel for plaintiff. If I find counsel willing to represent plaintiff, I will advise the parties of that fact and set a new schedule. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 6/14/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER denying as moot petitioner's 12 motion. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 4/20/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER on ifp request: Petitioner to submit $5 fee or motion for ifp/Trust Fund Account Statement by 2/26/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 2/8/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Homelsey, Charles v. Dittman, Michael | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Charles J. Homelsey aka Charles J. Mayberry | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Michael Dittman | |
| Represented By: | Gregory M. Weber |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
