Dilley, Judy v. Holiday Acres Stables et al
Plaintiff: Judy Dilley
Defendant: Holiday Acres Stables, Holiday Acres Properties, Inc. and Steve Krier
Case Number: 3:2016cv00091
Filed: February 10, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
County: Oneida
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 148 ORDER denying plaintiff Judy Dilley's 141 motion to stay the enforcement of bill of costs. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/24/2017. (jef),(ps)
July 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 123 JUDGMENT entered grantingsummary judgment in favor of defendants Steve Krier and Holiday Acres Properties,Inc. and dismissing this case with prejudice. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 7/6/2017. (jef),(ps)
May 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER granting Defendant Holiday Acres Properties, Inc.'s 40 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting Defendant Holiday Acres Properties, Inc.'s 62 Motion to Strike. Defendant Holiday Acres Properties, Inc. is DISMISSED from the case. P laintiff Judy Dilley is directed to respond to this order by June 12, 2017, and explain why the court should not grant summary judgment in favor of defendant Steve Krier under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f) and dismiss the case. Ruling on defendant Holiday Acres Properties, Inc.'s motion for a protective order, Dkt. 86 , is DEFERRED. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 5/31/2017. (jef),(ps)
July 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER Regarding Jurisdiction. Plaintiff Judy Dilley may have until July 20, 2016, to file and serve an amended complaint containing good faith allegations sufficient to establish complete diversity of citizenship for purposes of determining whether the court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. If plaintiff fails to timely amend her complaint, then the court will dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 7/6/2016. (kwf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dilley, Judy v. Holiday Acres Stables et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Judy Dilley
Represented By: Roy Cameron Dripps, III
Represented By: Courtney Cullen Stirrat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Holiday Acres Stables
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Holiday Acres Properties, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Krier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?