Drinkwater, Dale v. Wisconsin Dept. Of Corr. Medical Committee et al
| Dale D. Drinkwater |
| Wisconsin Dept. Of Corr. Medical Committee, Dr. Larson, Burnett, Hoftiezer, John Does, Bellin, Moerchen, Dr. Springs, Deitrich and Unknown John Does of FLCI HSU |
| 3:2016cv00134 |
| March 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Sauk |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants dismissing the case. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER denying plaintiff's 29 motion to add Lt. Burdick and Lt. Mariani as defendants; granting defendants' 38 motion for leave to file amended answer; denying plaintiff's motions for assistance in recruiting counsel (dkts. ## 25 , ]30], 34 , 36 ) without prejudice. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/6/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Dale D. Drinkwater's 4 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied as moot. Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Oppeneer on 3/24/2016. (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff to submit a trust fund account statement. Trust Fund Account Statement due 3/22/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 3/2/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
