K3 Prop, LLC v. GQ Sand, LLC
| K3 Prop, LLC |
| GQ Sand, LLC |
| 3:2016cv00142 |
| March 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER granting 95 Joint Motion to Vacate Amended Judgment. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 6/18/2018. (voc)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER granting 92 Joint Motion for Indicative Ruling re 85 Judgment, by Plaintiff K3 Prop, LLC, Counter Defendant K3 Prop, LLC, Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 5/16/2018. (voc)
|
|
Filing
85
AMENDED JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendant GQ Sand, LLC awarding attorney fees and costs in the amount of $17,330 and against, jointly and severally,plaintiffK3 Prop, LLC and its counsel, Attorney W. Kelly Puls, Attorney Mark A. Haney,Attorney Kolter R. Jennings,'and the law firm of Puls Haney P.L.L.C. (voc)
|
|
Filing
66
JUDGMENT entered dismissing all claims by and against all parties for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 7/6/2017. (voc)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER regarding jurisdiction. Plaintiff may have until 7/3/2017 to submit proof of complete diversity of citizenship and to show cause as to why the court should not strike Dkt. 48 as inadmissible evidence. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 06/29/2017. (cew)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDERED that: Plaintiff K3 Prop, LLC's motion for leave to file a motion to set aside default judgment, Dkt. 29 , and motion to set aside default judgment, Dkt. 30 , are DENIED. The clerk's entry of default against plaintiff, Dkt. 25 , is SET ASIDE. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a supplemental answer, Dkt. 28 , is GRANTED. The court accepts plaintiff's supplemental answer at Dkt. 33 as its operative responsive pleading. Defendant GQ Sand, LLC's motion for default judgment, Dkt. 26 , is DENIED. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/6/2016. (voc)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Regarding Jurisdiction. Plaintiff has until August 4, 2016 to file and serve an amended complaint containing good faith allegations sufficient to establish complete diversity of citizenship for purposes of determining subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Failure to do so will result in prompt dismissal of this matter for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 7/21/2016. (jls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: K3 Prop, LLC v. GQ Sand, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: K3 Prop, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Mark Alan Haney |
| Represented By: | William Kelly Puls |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GQ Sand, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
