Farnham, Kristie v. Caribou Coffee Company
Plaintiff: Kristie Farnham
Defendant: Caribou Coffee Company
Case Number: 3:2016cv00295
Filed: May 5, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
County: St. Croix
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER denying without prejudice 12 Motion to Stay; denying as moot 22 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/9/17. (jat)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Farnham, Kristie v. Caribou Coffee Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristie Farnham
Represented By: Frank Hedin
Represented By: David Philip Milian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caribou Coffee Company
Represented By: Erin Leigh Hoffman
Represented By: Mary Andreleita Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?