Munn, Rosalie v. Munn, Michelle et al
| Rosalie Munn |
| Michelle N. Munn and Alan P. Munn |
| 3:2016cv00318 |
| May 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| St. Croix |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER that the clerk's office enter Marta Meyers of the law firm of Boardman & Clark as plaintiff's pro bono counsel of record and to set this case for a status conference in mid- to late-February 2017, as the court's schedule allows. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 1/18/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER vacating the clerk's entry of default against defendant Michelle Munn. Plaintiff's 11 Motion for Default Judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted against Alan Munn in the amount of $97,500. In all other respects the motion is denied. The clerk of court is directed to enter partial judgment in favor of Rosalie Munn against Alan Munn in the amount of $97,500. This partial judgment fully resolves all claims Rosalie Munn has against Alan Munn. Defendant Michelle Munn's 21 motion for assistance in recruiting counsel is granted. The case is stayed pending recruitment of counsel. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 12/8/2016. (elc),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
