Allen, Raequon v. Mahoney, David et al
| Raequon Allen |
| David J. Mahoney, Richardson and Shellenberger |
| 3:2016cv00410 |
| June 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
146
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing the case. (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER setting an in-person Final Pretrial Conference for February 27, 2019 at 03:30 PM and re-setting Jury Selection and Trial to February 28, 2019 at 09:00 AM. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/5/2019. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendant's 122 combined motions in limine. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/4/2019. (DPM),(ps) Modified on 2/5/2019 (nln).
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER denying without prejudice 83 , 125 Motions for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum; denying as moot 98 Motion to Compel. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 1/18/2019. (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER denying plaintiff Raequon Allen's 72 Motion for reconsideration of motion; denying plaintiff's 102 Motion Under Rule 37(e) ; and denying defendant Alexa Richardson's 61 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Final Pretrial Conference in this matter is reset to a telephonic conference to take place on Friday February 1, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., with defense counsel responsible for initiating the call. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 1/8/2019. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER denying plaintiff's motion for assistance in recruiting counsel (dkt. 70) without prejudice. Plaintiff's opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment is due June 13, 2018, and defendant's reply is due June 25, 2018. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 5/7/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER granting defendant's motion to compel (dkt. # 43 ). By May 4, 2018, Allen must return to defendants the modified form consenting to disclosure of his medical records for the past six years. Plaintiff Raequon Dewrell Allen's moti on for temporary restraining order (dkt. # 30 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff Raequon Dewrell Allen's motion to amend complaint (dkt. # 35 ) and motion for sanctions (dkt. # 38 ) are DENIED. Plaintiff's motion to obtain affidavits/statements from incarcerated witnesses (dkt. # 68 ) and motion for assistance in recruiting counsel (dkt. # 53 ) are both denied without prejudice. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 4/27/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 22.23 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 9/21/2016. If plaintiff complies with this deadline, plaintiff's case will be reopened and screened on the merits pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(e)(2). Otherwise, this case will remain closed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 8/29/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER providing plaintiff an enlargement of time, to July 27, 2016, to submit his trust fund account statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 7/13/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER on ifp request: Trust Fund Account Statement due 7/5/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 6/14/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
