Lietz, Shane v. Dane County Sheriffs (Jail) et al
| Shane Lietz |
| Dane County Sheriffs (Jail), Nicholos Khran and Dave Mahoney |
| 3:2016cv00505 |
| July 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
JUDGMENT entered dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 3/16/2018. (jef/note, dkts. 30 and 31 were not mailed to plaintiff, as his address is unknown),(ps)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER that the complaint filed by plaintiff Shane Lietz is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/15/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER that Defendant may have until February 6, 2018, to notify the court whether he wishes to pursue his exhaustion defense (dkt. 15 ) further. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 1/23/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER granting plaintiff's motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. The complaint is taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 8/11/2016. (elc),(ps)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Shane Lietz assessed an initial partial filing fee of $ 15.00 due by 8/18/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 7/27/2016. (nln),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
