Kretlow, Bernard v. Schultz, Michael et al
Bernard Edward Kretlow |
Michael Schultz, Elsinger, Baumann, Cummings, Rozmarynski, Norton, Wasielewski, Allen, S. Garland and Lutsey |
3:2016cv00583 |
August 23, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Brown |
Stephen L. Crocker |
James D. Peterson |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dimismissing this case with prejudice for plaintiff Bernard Edward Kretlow's failure to prosecute it. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/14/2017. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 38 ORDER denying plaintiff Bernard Edward Kretlow's 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant Tonia Rozmarynoski's motion for leave to file a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, Dkt. 34 , is DENIED. Plaintiff must respond to this order indicating his intent to continue to litigate this case by November 21, 2017. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 11/7/2017. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 29 ORDER denying Plaintiff Bernard Edward Kretlow's 28 Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice. The clerk of court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the court's procedures on motions for summary judgment included with the pretrial conference order. Dkt. 24 . Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 6/13/2017. (jef/cc: plaintiff with sj procedures),(ps) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.