Dallas, Laponza v. County of Milwaukee et al
Laponzo M. Dallas |
County of Milwaukee, Daivd Clark, Clinic Supervisor, Jan and John Does, Clinic Doctors, Jan and John Doe, Chief Jailer, Jan Doe Jailer, Jailer Marchant, Mary Guimont and Armor Service |
3:2016cv00720 |
November 1, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Milwaukee |
Barbara B. Crabb |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ORDER denying plaintiff's 59 Motion to reconsider the three strikes order and for a transfer. The court will consider no further filings from plaintiff in cases 00-cv-87-bbc, 04-cv-374-bbc and 16-cv-720-bbc. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 12/27/2017. (elc),(ps) |
Filing 53 ORDER granting 28 motion to transfer filed by defendants David Clarke and Milwaukee County. The clerk of court is directed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 5/3/2017. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 22 ORDER that the $24.50 initial partial filing fee assessed to plaintiff Laponza Dallas for filing this case is waived. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 2/10/2017. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 16 ORDER denying plaintiff's 13 motion for reconsideration and 14 motion for leave to amend complaint. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/26/2017. (jef),(ps) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.