Lewis, James v. Henneman, Chad et al
| James A. Lewis |
| Chad Henneman, Lorie Iverson, Laurie Neuroth, Anthony Broadbent, Ellen Ray, Gary Boughton, Kartman, Sebranek, William Brown, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 |
| 3:2016cv00733 |
| November 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Grant |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| James D. Peterson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
ORDER denying 102 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 6/19/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
101
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 5/24/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER denying defendants' 81 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 5/21/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER denying plaintiff James A. Lewis's 67 motion for sanctions. The clerk of court is directed to schedule a hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss the case as a sanction, Dkt. 81 . Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 5/1/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER that by February 5, 2018, defendants must arrange for plaintiff James A. Lewis to view a copy of Chad Henneman's disciplinary records, Dkt. 37 -1 and Dkt. 37 -2, redacted in accordance with this opinion. Defendants must allow plaintiff sufficient time to review the records and take notes. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of the summary judgment briefing schedule, Dkt. 39 , is GRANTED. Plaintiff's response brief is due on February 28, 2018. Defendants' reply is due on March 12, 2018. Plaintiff's motion to strike defendants' expert witnesses, Dkt. 27 , is DENIED. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/29/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting in part and denying in part plaintiff James A. Lewis's Dkt. 15 motion to compel production of documents consistent with this opinion. By December 21, 2017, defendants must submit Chad Henneman's disciplinaryrecords co ncerning harassment, bullying, retaliation, and sexual misconduct to thecourt, under seal, for an in camera inspection, and a proposed method for allowing Lewis access to these records without compromising the Wisconsin Secure ProgramFacility's security. Plaintiff's motion for sanctions, Dkt. 20 , is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's motion for an evidentiary hearing, Dkt. 21 , is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for assistance in recruiting counsel, Dkt. 14 , is DENIED withoutprejudice. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/14/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed against defendants Chad Henneman, Lorie Iverson and Laurie Neuroth. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Anthony Broadbent, Ellen Ray, Gary Boughton, Mr. Kartman, Ms. Sebranek, William Brown, John Doe 1, and John Doe 2 are DISMISSED for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. Plaintiff may have until January 9, 2017, to file an amended complaint that provides a short and plain statement of a claim against these defendants. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/16/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 29.02 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 11/30/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 11/8/2016. (elc),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
