Holm, Victor v. Dittman, Michael et al
| Victor E. Holm |
| Michael Dittman, Mary Leiser, Donald Morgan, Lindsay Walker, Isaac Hart, D. Hautamaki, Begley, Pigeon and Frick |
| 3:2016cv00781 |
| November 28, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Columbia |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case with prejudice. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 3/6/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER dismissing plaintiff Victor Holm's 1 complaint. Holm may have until February 21, 2017, to file an amended complaint that corrects the defects identified in this order as to his claim that defendants Hautamaki, Begley, Pigeon, and Fric k interfered with his right to have access to the courts by confiscating his legal documents. All other claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, including Holm's claims against defendants Mary Leiser, Lindsay Walker, Donald Morgan, Isaac Hart, and Michael Dittman. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 2/2/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 14.19 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 12/23/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 11/30/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
