Holm, Victor v. Casiana et al
| Victor E. Holm |
| Casiana, Anderson, Trisha Anderson, Dr. Steuga, Donald Morgan, Mary Leiser, S. Hautamaki, David Melby, Miller, Lucas Wogernese, Michael Dittmann, Rhode, Sharalee Lundmark, Charles Factor, Cindy O'Donnell and John Does 1-3 |
| 3:2016cv00794 |
| December 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Columbia |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER denying plaintiff Victor E. Holm's 49 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 5/7/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
48
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 3/19/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying plaintiff Victor Holm's 23 Objection to 22 Expert Witness Disclosures; denying 24 Motion to Amend Complaint. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 1/5/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER denying 12 Motion for Use of Release Account Funds. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 9/19/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 14.19 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 12/23/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 12/1/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
