Jones, Nicholas v. Edge, Beth et al
| Nicholas A. Jones |
| Beth Edge, Joanne Govier and Larry Primmer |
| 3:2016cv00848 |
| December 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Grant |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| James D. Peterson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER granting in part defendants' 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Jones may proceed to trial on his remaining claims: Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference and Wisconsin-law medical malpractice claims against defendant Beth Edge based on her initial refusal to treat Jones's allergic reaction. An Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against defendant Joanne Govier based on her ignoring his psychological distress. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 5/21/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER granting defendants' 17 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on plaintiff Nicholas A. Jones's retaliation claims about his conduct report. Those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Defendant Larry Primmer is DISMISSED from the lawsuit. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/25/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $19.81 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 1/18/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 12/27/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
