Shanks, Peter v. Berryhill, Nancy
Plaintiff: Peter L. Shanks
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 3:2016cv00853
Filed: December 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
County: Sawyer
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Presiding Judge: Peter A. Oppeneer
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 14 JUDGMENT awarding plaintiff Peter Shanks attorney fees and costs in the amount of $703.29 under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. (arw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shanks, Peter v. Berryhill, Nancy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter L. Shanks
Represented By: Curtiss Norman Lein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Commissioner of Social Security(Designation Government)
Represented By: Richard Davis Humphrey(Designation Government)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?