Leiser, Jeffrey v. Richardson, Reed et al
| Jeffrey D. Leiser |
| Reed Richardson, Mario Canziani, J. Achterberg, Patrick J. Lynch, B. Lundmark, W. Katzmark, K. Johnson, G. Lawison, G. Hickey, Jane Doe's DOC Employees and John Doe's DOC Employees |
| 3:2016cv00860 |
| December 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Juneau |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER denying plaintiff Jeffrey Leiser's 51 motion for reconsideration and extension to appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 5/16/2019. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
50
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER denying plaintiff Jeffrey Leiser's motions seek injunctive relief (dkts. 19 , 23 , 27 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 10/5/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 126.95 assessed. (Initial partial filing fee due 2/1/2017.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 1/11/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER that plaintiff Jeffrey D. Leiser to submit $400 filing fee or Trust Fund Account Statement by 1/25/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 1/03/2017. (nln),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
