Key, Prince v. Boughton, Gary et al
| Prince D. Key |
| Gary Boughton, Robert Shannon, Joshua Kolbo and Joseph Cichanowicz |
| 3:2017cv00521 |
| July 6, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Grant |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| James D. Peterson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER that plaintiff Prince D. Key's motion to alter or amend the judgment, Dkt 57 , is DENIED. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/8/2019. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
56
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER granting in part defendants' 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants Joseph Cichanowicz and Gary Boughton are DISMISSED. The remaining defendants may have until July 25, 2019, to submit materials supplementing their motion for summary judgment as explained in this opinion. Plaintiff Prince D. Key may have until August 1, 2019, to respond. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 7/18/2019. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER denying 32 Motion for Reconsideration by Prince D. Key. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 02/14/2019. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER that plaintiff Prince D. Key's motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. 12 , is DENIED. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 02/07/2019. (rks),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
