Morris, Michael v. Dept. of Corrections et al
| Michael Morris |
| Dept. of Corrections, Gary Boughton, Kartman, John Doe white shirt, Hanfield, Lt. Sharpe, Chichanowicz, Harn, Jane Doe, Sgt. Sickinger, Dressler, Sutter, Dickman, Brown, Ray, Schwochert, Wall, A. Boatwright, Cindy O'Donnell, Charles Factor and Perisi |
| 3:2017cv00522 |
| July 5, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Grant |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER that plaintiff Michael Morris's motions to voluntarily dismiss Case Nos. 17-cv-522 and 17-cv-541, and to be excused from paying the filing fees (Case No. 17-cv-522, dkt. #17; Case No. 17-cv-541, dkt. #15.) are GRANTED. These cases are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 1/5/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
Filing
15
ORDER that plaintiff Michael Morris's motions to waive the $1.88 initial partial filing are GRANTED. Complaint taken under advisement for screening pursuant to 28U.S.C. § 1915A. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 8/4/2017. (nln),(ps)
|
Filing
3
ORDER directing plaintiff to submit the $400 filing fee or a motion for leave to proceed without prepayment and a Trust Fund Account Statement by 7/31/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 7/7/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.