Turner, Shakia v. Bruce, Andrew et al
Shakia Turner |
Andrew Bruce and Jim Morovic |
3:2017cv00578 |
July 25, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Dane |
Barbara B. Crabb |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 65 OPINION AND ORDER on Qualified Immunity. Defendants' assertion of qualified immunity is RESERVED as to defendant Bruce and GRANTED as to defendant Morovic. The remaining claim against defendant Morovic for unreasonable detention is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/1/2019. (kwf) |
Filing 55 ORDER granting in part and reserving in part 25 Motion in Limine; denying in part and reserving in part 31 and 32 Motions in Limine; granting 33 Motion in Limine; granting in part and reserving in part 35 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion in Limine; granting 37 Motion in Limine; granting 38 Motion in Limine; granting 39 Motion in Limine; granting 40 Motion in Limine. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 1/22/2019. (arw) |
Filing 12 ORDER construing 11 Stipulated Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Plaintiff's State Law Claims as a request to amend the complaint to remove the Wisconsin state law claims and granting that request. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 1/17/2018. (kwf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.