Vogelsberg, Jeffrey v. Kim, Young et al
| Jeffrey Vogelsberg |
| Young Kim, Cheryl Walters, Satinder Dhanoa, Brenda Bredlow, Stephanie Webster, Melissa Bennet, Tenzin Enders, James Matthews, Tsetan Dolqar, Michael Statz, Correct Care Solutions and Dane County |
| 3:2017cv00596 |
| July 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dodge |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| James D. Peterson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
215
ORDER denying 205 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment; denying as moot 212 Motion for Use of Release Account Funds. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 4/19/2021. (lam),(ps)
|
|
Filing
196
ORDER granting 189 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; denying 191 request for preparation of transcripts. Vogelsberg must make an initial partial payment of the appellate fee, which the court has calculated as $64.84 by November 20, 2020. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 11/4/2020. (lam),(ps)
|
|
Filing
193
ORDER on ifp request: Trust Fund Account Statement due 10/28/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 10/7/2020. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
166
JUDGMENT entered in favor of dismissing the case. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
153
ORDER that Vogelsberg's motion for an extension of time, Dkt. 150 , is GRANTED. Vogelsberg may have until February 3, 2020, to file ALL remaining documents in opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. Defendants may have until February 18, 2020, to respond if they wish. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/27/2020. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER that plaintiff Jeffrey Vogelsberg's "motion for assistance," Dkt. 131 , is GRANTED in part. Vogelsberg's deadline for filing his summary judgment response is extended to January 2, 2020. Vogelsberg's motion is DENIED in all other respects. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/18/2019. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER that plaintiff Jeffrey Vogelsberg's response to defendants' motions for summary judgment is EXTENDED to December 24, 2019. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/17/2019. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER that plaintiff Jeffrey Vogelsberg's motion to strike his deposition, Dkt. 111 , is DENIED. Vogelsberg may have until December 18, 2019, to file his response to defendants' motions for summary judgment. Defendants may have until January 4, 2020, to file a reply. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 9/19/2019. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER that Plaintiff Jeffrey Vogelsberg's 96 motion for appointment of a guardian ad litem, 86 Rule 56(d) motion, and 100 motion to seal are DENIED. Briefing deadlines reset as to summary judgment motions. Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition due 9/12/2019. Defendants' Brief in Reply due 9/23/2019. The trial date and all pretrial deadlines are STRUCK. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 8/13/2019. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying plaintiff Jeffrey Vogelsberg's 39 Motion for court deadline to file a motion to compel. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/9/2019. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Jeffrey Vogelsberg assessed an initial partial filing fee of $24.75 due 8/23/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 8/1/2017. (nln),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
