Werner, Doug v. Waterstone Mortgage Corporation
Doug Werner and William Wiesneski |
Waterstone Mortgage Corporation |
3:2017cv00608 |
August 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Waukesha |
Stephen L. Crocker |
James D. Peterson |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 OPINION and ORDER denying 104 Motion to Compel Arbitration; denying 109 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/13/2018. (kwf) |
Filing 103 OPINION & ORDER denying 83 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 88 Motion for Order Declaring Plaintiffs Have Waived Right to Arbitrate and Enjoining Plaintiffs from Pursuing Arbitration. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/1/2018. (kwf) |
Filing 78 ORDER denying 22 Motion for Conditional Certification of Class. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 2/9/2018. (jls) |
Filing 42 OPINION & ORDER denying 19 Motion to Strike Amended Complaint; denying 38 Motion for Tolling Order; setting briefing on 22 Motion for Conditional Certification of Class. Defendant may have until January 16, 2018, to file a response to plaintiffs' motion for conditional certification. Plaintiffs may have until January 23, 2018, to file a reply. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/3/2018. (kwf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.