Honeywell International Inc. v. Research Products Corporation
Honeywell International Inc. |
Research Products Corporation |
3:2017cv00723 |
September 21, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Dane |
William M. Conley |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion to Limit the Number of Claims and Prior Art in Scheduling Order. Plaintiff shall identify 16 claims by 7/30/2018. Defendant shall identify 32 prior art references by 8/20/2018; granting [36 ] Motion for Leave to File Surreply in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Limit the Number of Asserted Claims and Prior Art References; granting 40 Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Lim it the Number of Asserted Claims and Prior Art References; granting 47 Motion for Leave to File Response to Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Limit the Number of Asserted Claims and Prior Art Reference s; granting 49 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Defendant's answer to the amended complaint is due 5/1/2018. Plaintiff's amended infringement contentions are due 7 days later. Defendant's amended invalidity contentions are due 28 days after plaintiff's amended infringement contentions are served. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 4/17/2018. (jls) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.