Smith-Williams, Consuela et al v. The United States of America
Consuela Smith-Williams, Fred Rivers, Richard Murphy, Robert Ristow, Roger Suhr and Salvador Fuentes |
The United States of America |
3:2017cv00823 |
November 1, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Monroe |
William M. Conley |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 174 ORDER granting in part and denying in part and reserving in part defendant's 152 Motion in Limine; granting, subject to modification at the final pretrial conference, respondent's 157 Motion to Quash. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 12/10/2019. (jls) |
Filing 142 ORDER denying 89 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 10/8/2019. (jls) |
Filing 88 ORDER denying 30 Motion to Certify Class under Rule 23. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 4/25/2019. (jls) |
Filing 28 ORDER denying 8 Motion to Dismiss; denying 26 Motion to Stay Class Certification Briefing. Each of the three deadlines related to plaintiffs' class certification motion is extended one week. Motion to Certify Class under Rule 23 due 10/26/2018. Response due 11/23/2018. Reply due 12/14/2018. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 9/25/2018. (arw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.