Nelson, Darryl et al v. Doe et al
| Darryl Nelson |
| Doe, Michael Dittmann, Lucas Weber, Lindsay Walker, Jason Chatman, Nowak, Slama, Cornelius, Bergeren, Nyugen, Schneider and Lloyd |
| 3:2017cv00846 |
| November 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Columbia |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER that this case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The clerk's office is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/25/2020. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER that plaintiff Darryl Nelson may have until February 20, 2020, to file a response to defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings and return a signed medical records release to defendants' attorney. If Nelson does not respond by that date, the court will dismiss Nelson's claims with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Nelson's failure to prosecute it. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/6/2020. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Darryl Nelson assessed an initial partial filing fee of $50.53 due 11/30/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 11/8/2017. (nln),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
