Ledwith, Maximillian v. Access Community Health et al
| Maximillian Ledwith |
| Access Community Health, Center's Dental Clinc d/b/a Madison Community Dental and John Wiederholt |
| 3:2017cv00894 |
| November 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendant dismissing the case. (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2679(b) and § 2679(d)(2), that: the United States is added as a defendant to the claims set forth in the complaint; Those claims are DISMISSED with respect to both of the originally named defendants on the ground that the exclusive remedy for these claims is an action against the United States; and The caption of this case shall be amended to reflect the substitution of the United States as the sole defendant. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 7/24/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Maximillian Ledwith's 2 motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees is GRANTED. Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 12/5/2017. (nln),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
