Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue et al
| Union Pacific Railroad Company |
| Wisconsin Department of Revenue and Richard G. Chandler |
| 3:2017cv00897 |
| November 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 49 U.S.C. ยง 11503 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
JUDGMENT entered in favor of Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company finding that the Wisconsin property tax on the value of Union Pacific's custom computer software is discriminatory as to Union Pacific in violation of the Railroad Revi talization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, 49 U.S.C. § 11501 (b)(4); defendants Wisconsin Department of Revenue and Peter Barca in his official capacity as Secretary of Revenue, their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, success ors, and all those acting in concert or participating with them are ENJOINED from assessing, levying, or collecting property taxes on the value of Union Pacific's custom computer software, and from instituting any proceedings to assess, levy, or collect any amount of property taxes, interest, or penalties that the defendants might assert to be due and owing from Union Pacific on the value of Union Pacific's custom computer software. (WMC/PAO) (kwf)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER re: Permanent Injunction. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/21/19. (jat)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER granting 24 Motion for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company; denying 33 Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Richard G. Chandler, Wisconsin Department of Revenue. Defendants are enjoined from assessing or collec ting a tax on Union Pacific's custom computer software under Chapter 76 of the Wisconsin Statutes. The parties may have 14 days to meet and confer on the appropriate form of a permanent injunction, at which point they are to jointly submit a proposed injunction. Failing that, they are to submit separate proposals and a brief explanation as to why their proposal is preferable. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/5/2019. (arw)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER Requesting Additional Information. Response due 2/27/2019. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/20/2019. (arw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
