Bull, Duane v. Hepp, Randall et al
| Duane R. Bull |
| Randall Hepp, Edward Wall, John Maggioncalda, Steve Bethke and E. Davidson |
| 3:2017cv00957 |
| December 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dodge |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
178
ORDER that Plaintiff Duane Bull's motion for summary judgment, Dkt. 160 , is DENIED. Defendant Candace Whitman's motion for summary judgment, Dkt. 164 , is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 3/13/2023. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER that plaintiff Duane Bull is GRANTED leave to proceed on an Eighth Amendment medical care claim against defendant Candice Whitman. The remaining defendants are DISMISSED from the case. The Wisconsin Department of Justice may have until March 8, 2022, to notify the court whether it will accept service for new defendant Whitman. After defendant Whitman is served, the clerk of court is directed to set a preliminary pretrial conference before Magistrate Judge Stephen Crocker to set a schedule for the remainder of the case. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 2/22/2022. (lam),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Duane R. Bull assessed an initial partial filing fee of $16.46 due 1/18/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 12/27/17. (nln),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
