Sierra-Lopez, David et al v. Director/Commissioner of the State of WI et al
David E. Sierra-Lopez |
Director/Commissioner of the State of WI and John Doe |
3:2018cv00060 |
January 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Columbia |
Barbara B. Crabb |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 69 JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case with prejudice. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 66 ORDER that plaintiff David E. Sierra-Lopez may have until July 16, 2019 to file a response to defendants' motions for summary judgment. If plaintiff does not respond by that date, I will dismiss this case with prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 for plaintiff's failure to prosecute it. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 7/2/2019. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 7 ORDER that plaintiff David E. Sierra-Lopez may have until April 4, 2018, to identify for the court which lawsuit he wishes to litigate under the number assigned to this case and whether he wishes to pursue the other lawsuits under separate case numbers. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 3/21/2018. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 5 ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 5.37 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 3/1/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 2/7/2018. (jef),(ps) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.