Terrell, Michael v. Richardson, Reed et al
| Michael D. Terrell |
| Reed Richardson, Paul Lynch, Chause, L. Baker, Joan M. Hannula, Becher, Scott R. Bassuener, Matt Zimmerman, Andrew B. Ross and Joseph R. Demartini |
| 3:2018cv00130 |
| February 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Racine |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| James D. Peterson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants dismissing the case. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER that that plaintiff Michael Terrell may have until March 19, 2020 to file a response to defendants' motions for summary judgment. If he does not respond by that date, I will dismiss this case with prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 for pla intiff's failure to prosecute it. Reset Briefing as to 75 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, 81 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition due 3/19/2020, Defendants' Brief in Reply due 3/30/2020. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 3/12/2020. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER that Plaintiff Michael Terrell's motions for reconsideration, Dkts. 64 - 68 , are DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for assistance in recruiting counsel, Dkt. 62 , is DENIED. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 01/7/2020. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER that Plaintiff Michael Terrell's motion for reconsideration, Dkt. 53 , is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion to amend the expert disclosure deadline, Dkt. 50 , and defendants' motion to amend the schedule, Dkt. 57 , are GRANTED. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 11/20/2019. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER that the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Paul Lynch, Chause, Joan Hannula, Dkt. 35 , is GRANTED. Plaintiff Michael Terrell's claims against Lynch, Chause, and Hannula are DISMISSED without prejudice for Terrell's fa ilure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Plaintiff Michael Terrell's motion to amend his complaint to add claims against Dr. Baer and Dr. Wolbrink, Dkt. 40 , is GRANTED. The Department of Justice may have 21 days to inform plaint iff and the court whether it accepts service on behalf of defendants Baer and Wolbrink. Plaintiff's motion for court assistance in obtaining medical records, Dkt. 41 , is GRANTED. The clerk of court is directed to issue a subpoena form. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/31/2019. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting leave to proceed on clams against defendants Lynch, Chause, Hannula, Ross, Demartini, Becher and Bassuener. Defendants Baker and Zimmerman are DISMISSED from the case.The Department of Justice may have 21 days to inform plain tiff and the court whether it accepts service on behalf of defendant Becher. The clerk of court is directed to forward a summons, the complaint, Dkt. 6 , and supplements to the complaint, Dkt. 21 and Dkt. 24 , to the United States Marshal for service on defendant Bassuener. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/20/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER that Plaintiff Michael Terrell may have until September 14, 2018, to supplement his allegations against defendants Baker and Becher. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 8/27/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 82.01 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 3/16/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 2/23/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
