Sharp, Robert v. Numsen, John et al
| Robert Carl Sharp |
| John Numsen, T. Roberts, Louis Williams, II, Sara Revell and Ian Connors |
| 3:2018cv00195 |
| March 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Grant |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
JUDGMENT is entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case without prejudice as to defendants Revell and Connors, and with prejudice as to defendants Numsen, Roberts, and Williams. (lam),(ps)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER that defendants' motion to dismiss (dkt. # 25 ) is GRANTED, although as specifically set forth in this order, defendants Revell and Connors dismissal is without prejudice. Plaintiff Robert Sharp's motion for a preliminary injunction (dkt. # 21 ) and renewed motion for assistance in recruiting counsel (dkt. # 31 ) are DENIED as moot. The clerk of court is directed to enter final judgment in defendants' favor and close this case. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/21/2022. (lam),(ps)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 42.87 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 4/5/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 4/5/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
