Stowe, Graham v. Van Rybroek, Gregory et al
Plaintiff: Graham L. Stowe
Defendant: Gregory Van Rybroek, Mel Christiansen, Melissa Plumley and Kevin Laetsch
Case Number: 3:2018cv00321
Filed: May 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
County: Dane
Presiding Judge: William M. Conley
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 41 JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendant dismissing this case. (jef),(ps)
February 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER that Defendant Gregory Van Rybroek's motion to compel (dkt. 16 ) is GRANTED. Not later than March 1, 2021, Plaintiff Graham Stowe either must provide to defendant's attorney the signed medical records authorizations or must advise de fendant's attorney in writing that he has chosen not to provide the authorizations. Plaintiff's motion for assistance in recruiting counsel (dkt. 18 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for an extension (dkt. 19 ) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/8/2021. (lam),(ps)
May 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER denying plaintiff Graham Stowe leave to proceed on the claims outlined in his complaint, and the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has until May 15, 2019, to file an amended complaint. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 4/24/2019. (jef/cc: plaintiff via U.S. mail),(ps)
May 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Graham Stowe assessed an initial partial filing fee of $10.19 due 5/31/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 5/9/2018. (nln),(ps)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stowe, Graham v. Van Rybroek, Gregory et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Graham L. Stowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory Van Rybroek
Represented By: Corey Francis Finkelmeyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mel Christiansen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melissa Plumley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin Laetsch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?