Smith, Antonio v. Kolbo et al
| Antonio J. Smith |
| Kolbo, John Doe Officers, John Doe Sgt. and John Doe White Shirts |
| 3:2018cv00385 |
| May 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Grant |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| James D. Peterson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER that Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. 57 , is GRANTED. Defendants Gary Boughton, Daniel Suthers, Todd Breese, Matthew Peckham, Brock Linsey-Steldt, Joshua Brown, Ricky Stillwell, Patrick Govier, and Steve Eck are DISMISSED from the case. Plaintiff Antonio J. Smith's motions for in camera review and for spoliation sanctions, Dkt. 51 and Dkt. 62 , are DENIED. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/9/2019. (rks),(ps)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting plaintiff Antonio J. Smith on Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Joshua Kolbo, Michael Hanfeld, Brock Lisney-Steldt, Matthew Peckham, Ricky Stillwell, Daniel Suthers, Joshua Brown, Todd Bresee, Stephen Schneider, Steve Eck, J ared Hunt, Nicole Loomis, Rebecca Eagleburger, Michael Snyder, Patrick Govier, Leslie Atwood, Dustin Jaynes, A. Drone, Gary Boughton, Stacey Hoem, and Jolinda Waterman. The Wisconsin Department of Justice may have until August 2, 2019, to explain whether it will accept service on behalf of the newly added defendants. Defendants Brian Lange and Wayne Primmer are DISMISSED from the case. Defendants may have until August 2, 2019 to respond to Smith's amended complaint regarding the a lleged destruction of video evidence. Smith may have until August 9, 2019, to reply. Defendants' motion to stay deadlines, Dkt. 42 , is GRANTED. The schedule is amended as set forth within this order. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 7/19/2019. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER directing the clerk of court amend the caption to include Leslie Atwood as a defendant. Plaintiff Antonio J. Smith may have until February 22, 2019, to submit an amended complaint that explains how each proposed defendant violated his rights. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 2/4/2019. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER that The Wisconsin Department of Justice may have until February 14, 2019, to serve the proper person with notice of death or show cause why they are unable to do so. Once the Wisconsin DOJ files proof of service, plaintiff will have 90 days to file a motion for substitution. Plaintiff may have until February 7, 2019, to respond to this order regarding defendant Doe Atwood. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 1/23/2019. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying plaintiff Antonio J. Smith's 15 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying plaintiff's 16 motion regarding the deposit of damages awarded in this lawsuit. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 9/14/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Antonio J. Smith assessed an initial partial filing fee of $178.22. Plaintiff's motion to use his release account funds to pay the $178.22 initial partial filing fee, dkt. # 4 , is GRANTED. Initial partial filing fee due 7/10/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 6/11/2018. (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER that Plaintiff Antonio J. Smith submit $400 fee or motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis along with Trust Fund Account Statement by 6/12/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 5/21/2018. (nln),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
