Nye, Travis et al v. Town of Sanborn
Nicholas Nye, Sr. and Travis Nye |
Town of Sanborn |
3:2018cv00648 |
August 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Ashland |
Stephen L Crocker |
James D Peterson |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker: Telephone Preliminary Pretrial Conference held on 9/21/2018 [:10] Associated Cases: 3:18-cv-00611-jdp et al. (cak) |
Filing 5 Joint Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Associated Cases: 3:18-cv-00611-jdp et al. (Huerter, John) Modified on 9/17/2018 (voc). |
|
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Town of Sanborn. (Bitar, Remzy) |
Filing 2 Affidavit of Remzy D. Bitar re: #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Answer) (Bitar, Remzy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ashland County Circuit Court, case number 18cv116. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2295122), filed by Town of Sanborn. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bitar, Remzy) |
Standard attachments for District Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kwf) |
Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (kwf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.