Anderson, David v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Plaintiff: David Anderson
Defendant: Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2018cv00706
Filed: August 23, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Referring Judge: James D Peterson
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 2605
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2018 Filing 17 Brief in Support of #16 Motion to Compel Arbitration by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (Stedman, Emily)
October 15, 2018 Filing 16 Motion to Compel Arbitration by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Response due 10/22/2018. (Stedman, Emily)
October 15, 2018 Filing 15 Disregard - refiled as dkt. #17 . Modified on 10/15/2018 (jef).
October 15, 2018 Filing 14 Disregard - refiled as dkt. #16 . Modified on 10/15/2018 (jef).
October 15, 2018 Reset Deadlines as to #16 Motion to Compel Arbitration. Brief in Opposition due 10/29/2018. Brief in Reply due 11/5/2018. (jat)
October 12, 2018 Filing 13 Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Report by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (Stedman, Emily)
October 8, 2018 Filing 12 Notice of Appearance filed by David P. Muth for Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (Muth, David) Modified on 10/9/2018. (lak)
October 2, 2018 Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT (Class Action) against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., filed by David Anderson, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Mortgage Loan Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Mortgage Statement Prior Servicer Mailed to Plaintiff, #3 Exhibit C - Servicing Transfer Notice Defendant Mailed to Plaintiff, #4 Exhibit D - Mortgage Statement Defendant Mailed to Plaintiff, #5 Exhibit E - Mortgage Statement Defendant Mailed to Plaintiff, #6 Exhibit F - Qualified Written Request Plaintiff Mailed to Defendant, #7 Exhibit G - Response to Qualified Written Request Defendant Mailed to Plaintiff, #8 Exhibit H - Qualified Written Request Plaintiff Mailed to Defendant, #9 Exhibit I - Response to Qualified Written Request Defendant Mailed to Plaintiff) (Fruchter, Jesse) Modified on 10/3/2018. (lak)
October 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Dkt. #7 . The amendment is made within 15 days of defendant's answer so the motion was not strictly necessary, but plaintiff says he filed it as a courtesy. The court will grant the relief requested in plaintiff's motion without making any other determination on the merits of the motion. Plaintiff should file its amended complaint as a separate docket entry. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/2/18. (jat)
October 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER ** Briefing on plaintiff's motion to certify a Rule 23 class is stayed pending entry of a full schedule at the telephonic preliminary pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 10/1/18. (jat)
September 28, 2018 Filing 8 Interim Motion to Certify Class under Rule 23 (Damasco, Campbell-Ewald) by Plaintiff David Anderson. Brief in Opposition due 10/19/2018. Brief in Reply due 10/29/2018. (Fruchter, Jesse)
September 28, 2018 Filing 7 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and Exhibits by Plaintiff David Anderson, (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit A - Mortgage Loan Agreement, #3 Exhibit B - Mortgage Statement Prior Servicer Mailed to Plaintiff, #4 Exhibit C - Servicing Transfer Notice Defendant Mailed to Plaintiff, #5 Exhibit D - Mortgage Statement Defendant Mailed to Plaintiff, #6 Exhibit E - Mortgage Statement Defendant Mailed to Plaintiff, #7 Exhibit F - Qualified Written Request Plaintiff Mailed to Plaintiff, #8 Exhibit G - Response to Qualified Written Request Defendant Mailed to Plaintiff, #9 Exhibit H - Qualified Written Request Plaintiff Mailed to Defendant, #10 Exhibit I - Response to Qualified Written Request Defendant Mailed to Plaintiff) (Fruchter, Jesse) Modified on 10/1/2018. (lak)
September 26, 2018 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (Stedman, Emily)
September 25, 2018 Case randomly reassigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (lak)
September 24, 2018 Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Emily Logan Stedman for Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (Stedman, Emily)
September 21, 2018 Filing 4 ANSWER by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (Remington, John)
September 21, 2018 Set Telephone Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 10/17/2018 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (jat)
September 21, 2018 Action Requested: If you have not already provided your #Consent to Magistrate/Request for Reassignment form, please do so by 9/28/2018. (jat)
August 23, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (jat)
August 23, 2018 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff David Anderson. (Fruchter, Jesse)
August 23, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0758-2305609) filed by David Anderson, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Mortgage Loan Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Mortgage Statement Prior Servicer Mailed to Plaintiff, #3 Exhibit C - Servicing Transfer Notice Defendant Mailed to Plaintiff, #4 Exhibit D - Mortgage Statement Defendant Mailed to Plaintiff, #5 Exhibit E - Mortgage Statement Defendant Mailed to Plaintiff, #6 Exhibit F - Qualified Written Request Plaintiff Mailed to Defendant, #7 Exhibit G - Response to Qualified Written Request Defendant Mailed to Plaintiff, #8 Exhibit H - Qualified Written Request Plaintiff Mailed to Defendant, #9 Exhibit I - Response to Qualified Written Request Defendant Mailed to Plaintiff, #10 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Summons on Defendant) (Fruchter, Jesse) Modified on 8/24/2018. (lak)
August 23, 2018 Standard attachments for Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: #Corporate Disclosure Statement, #Order Regarding Assignment of Cases, #Notice of Assignment to a Magistrate Judge and Consent/Request for Reassignment, #Order on Dispositive Motions. (jat)
August 23, 2018 Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (jat)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson, David v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Anderson
Represented By: Jesse Fruchter
Represented By: Mark Andrew Eldridge
Represented By: Robert Kennedy O'Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Represented By: Emily Logan Stedman
Represented By: David P. Muth
Represented By: John R Remington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?