Ratliff, Everett v. Hentz, Anthony et al
| Everett Ratliff |
| Anthony Hentz, Cecilia Hutchenson-Smith and Kristine Pralle |
| 3:2018cv00729 |
| September 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Barbara B Crabb |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Prisoner (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER on Leave to Proceed: Plaintiff granted leave to proceed against Defendants Kristine Pralle, Anthony Hentz, Plaintiff Everett Ratliff. Materials delivered to DOJ for acceptance of service. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 10/23/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
| Initial Partial Filing fee received: $ 3.06, receipt number 34690032858. (jef),(ps) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 3.06 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 9/28/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 9/5/2018. (elc),(ps)
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Everett Ratliff (elc),(ps) |
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Everett Ratliff. (elc),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anthony Hentz, Cecilia Hutchenson-Smith, Kristine Pralle, filed by Everett Ratliff. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge Barbara B. Crabb) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (elc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
