Hickman, Charles v. Royal Credit Union
Charles R. Hickman, II |
Royal Credit Union |
3:2018cv00738 |
September 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
William M Conley |
Stephen L Crocker |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #7 Motion to Admit James Justin Manchee Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 10/29/2018. (lak) |
Filing 7 Motion to Admit James Justin Manchee Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number 0758-2346807.) by Plaintiff Charles R. Hickman, II. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Manchee, James) |
Reset Deadlines and Hearings: Telephone Pretrial Conference reset for 11/9/2018 at 1:00 PM at the request of counsel for plaintiff. Counsel for plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. (arw) |
Set Telephone Pretrial Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 11/8/2018 at 1:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (kwf) |
Filing 6 ANSWER by Defendant Royal Credit Union. (Cornetta, Matthew) |
Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Matthew John Cornetta for Defendant Royal Credit Union. (Cornetta, Matthew) |
Filing 4 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. Royal Credit Union served on 9/21/2018, answer due 10/12/2018. (lak) |
Filing 3 Disregard. Modified on 10/3/2018. (lak) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Royal Credit Union. (kwf) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (kwf) |
Standard attachments for District Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kwf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Royal Credit Union, ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number NEXT.), filed by Charles R. Hickman, II, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - TransUnion Credit Report 6/29/17, #2 Exhibit B - Credit Report 1/41/18, #3 Exhibit C - Discharge Order, #4 Exhibit D - Credit Report 6/18/18, #5 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons) (Lein, Matthew) |
Filing fee received: $ 400, receipt number 34690032748. (jef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hickman, Charles v. Royal Credit Union | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Charles R. Hickman, II | |
Represented By: | Matthew Curtiss Lein |
Represented By: | James Justin Manchee |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Royal Credit Union | |
Represented By: | Matthew John Cornetta |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.