Hickman, Charles v. Royal Credit Union
Plaintiff: Charles R. Hickman, II
Defendant: Royal Credit Union
Case Number: 3:2018cv00738
Filed: September 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William M Conley
Referring Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting #7 Motion to Admit James Justin Manchee Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 10/29/2018. (lak)
October 29, 2018 Filing 7 Motion to Admit James Justin Manchee Pro Hac Vice. ( Pro Hac Vice fee $ 100 receipt number 0758-2346807.) by Plaintiff Charles R. Hickman, II. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (Manchee, James)
October 15, 2018 Reset Deadlines and Hearings: Telephone Pretrial Conference reset for 11/9/2018 at 1:00 PM at the request of counsel for plaintiff. Counsel for plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. (arw)
October 11, 2018 Set Telephone Pretrial Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 11/8/2018 at 1:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (kwf)
October 10, 2018 Filing 6 ANSWER by Defendant Royal Credit Union. (Cornetta, Matthew)
October 10, 2018 Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Matthew John Cornetta for Defendant Royal Credit Union. (Cornetta, Matthew)
October 3, 2018 Filing 4 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. Royal Credit Union served on 9/21/2018, answer due 10/12/2018. (lak)
October 3, 2018 Filing 3 Disregard. Modified on 10/3/2018. (lak)
September 14, 2018 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Royal Credit Union. (kwf)
September 14, 2018 Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (kwf)
September 14, 2018 Standard attachments for District Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kwf)
September 6, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Royal Credit Union, ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number NEXT.), filed by Charles R. Hickman, II, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - TransUnion Credit Report 6/29/17, #2 Exhibit B - Credit Report 1/41/18, #3 Exhibit C - Discharge Order, #4 Exhibit D - Credit Report 6/18/18, #5 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons) (Lein, Matthew)
September 6, 2018 Filing fee received: $ 400, receipt number 34690032748. (jef)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hickman, Charles v. Royal Credit Union
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles R. Hickman, II
Represented By: Matthew Curtiss Lein
Represented By: James Justin Manchee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Royal Credit Union
Represented By: Matthew John Cornetta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?