Smith, Christopher v. Hepp, Randall et al
| Christopher D. Smith |
| Dylon Radtke, Cathy Jess, Dr. B. Supervill, C. Whitman, Randall Hepp, Greg Paul, L. Bartow, John Maggioncalda, J. Labelle, Dr. R. Steliga, Mark Schomisch, Dr. Larson and Ludwig, RN |
| 3:2018cv00774 |
| September 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| James D Peterson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Judge update in case. Case now assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson. Case no longer assigned to District Judge William M. Conley. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Partial Filing fee received: $9.77, receipt number 34690032940. (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Christopher D. Smith assessed an initial partial filing fee of $9.77 due 10/15/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 9/21/18. (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing 3
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Christopher D. Smith. (nln),(ps) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/21/2018: #1 IPP Calculation) (nln).
|
|
Filing 2
Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Christopher D. Smith. (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Christopher D. Smith. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (nln)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
