Tucker, James v. Jackson Correctional Institution et al
Plaintiff: James O. Tucker
Defendant: Jackson Correctional Institution and Lizzie Tegels
Case Number: 3:2018cv00825
Filed: October 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William M Conley
Referring Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2018 Filing 8 Notice of Appearance filed by Sarah L. Burgundy for Respondent Lizzie Tegels. (Burgundy, Sarah),(ps)
November 5, 2018 Filing 7 Corrected Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - State and Uncompleted Petition and Affidavit to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and/or Costs, ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0758-2333417.), filed by James O. Tucker. (Aquino, Thomas),(ps) Modified on 11/6/2018. (lak)
November 2, 2018 Filing 6 Acceptance of Service by DOJ on behalf of Respondent Lizzie Tegels. (Kawski, Clayton),(ps)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order to Show Cause Issued. Materials served on WI Department of Justice pursuant to informal service agreement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 11/2/2018. (jef),(ps) Corrected docket text on 11/2/2018 (jef).
October 24, 2018 Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Thomas Brady Aquino for Petitioner James O. Tucker. (Aquino, Thomas),(ps)
October 9, 2018 Filing 3 Brief in Support of #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Plaintiff James O. Tucker. (Sanders-Drazen, Megan),(ps)
October 9, 2018 Filing 2 Unsigned Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - State and Uncompleted Petition and Affidavit to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and/or Costs, ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0758-2333417.), filed by James O. Tucker, (Attachments: #1 Excerpt from Postconviction Motion Hearing Transcript, #2 Excerpt from Postconviction Motion Hearing Transcript, #3 Circuit court's Order Denying Postconviction Motion, #4 Court of Appeals Opinion Affirming Circuit Court, #5 Wisconsin Supreme Court Order Denying Petition for Review) (Sanders-Drazen, Megan),(ps) Modified on 10/10/2018. (lak)
October 9, 2018 Judge update in case. Case now assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (nln),(ps)
October 8, 2018 Filing 1 Disregard. To be refiled. Modified on 10/9/2018. (lak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tucker, James v. Jackson Correctional Institution et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jackson Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lizzie Tegels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James O. Tucker
Represented By: Megan Sanders-Drazen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?