Davidson, Vickey v. State Collection Services Inc.
Vickey D. Davidson |
State Collection Services Inc. |
3:2018cv01064 |
December 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Stephen L Crocker |
James D Peterson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Certificate of Service re: #11 Amended Answer by Defendant State Collection Services Inc. (Glazer, Saul),(ps) Modified on 2/20/2019. (lak) |
Filing 11 Amended Answer to #1 Complaint by Defendant State Collection Services Inc. (Glazer, Saul),(ps) |
Filing 10 Certificate of Service by Defendant State Collection Services Inc. as to #8 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #7 Notice of Appearance, #9 Answer. (Glazer, Saul),(ps) |
Filing 9 ANSWER by Defendant State Collection Services Inc. (Glazer, Saul),(ps) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant State Collection Services Inc. (Glazer, Saul),(ps) |
Filing 7 Notice of Appearance filed by Saul Coerver Glazer for Defendant State Collection Services Inc. (Glazer, Saul),(ps) |
Set Telephone Pretrial Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 3/8/2019 at 02:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Plaintiff responsible for contacting the court at (608) 264-5153. Once plaintiff's call has been received, the court will then include counsel for defendant in the conference call. [#Notice Regarding the Telephone Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (nln),(ps) |
Filing 6 Marshal Service Return Executed. State Collection Services Inc. served on 1/16/2019, answer due 2/6/2019. (rks),(ps) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to State Collection Services Inc. forwarded to US Marshals for service. (rks),(ps) |
Filing 4 ORDER on Leave to Proceed: Plaintiff granted leave to proceed against Defendant State Collection Services Inc. Service to be made by USMS. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 01/10/2019. (rks),(ps) |
Filing 3 ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Vickey D. Davidson's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 is GRANTED. Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 12/26/2018. (nln),(ps) |
Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Vickey D. Davidson. (nln),(ps) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State Collection Services Inc., filed by Vickey D. Davidson. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson.) (Attachments: #1 EEOC Determination Letter, EEOC Notice of Right to Sue) (nln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Davidson, Vickey v. State Collection Services Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: State Collection Services Inc. | |
Represented By: | Saul Coerver Glazer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Vickey D. Davidson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.