Wheeler, Amanda v. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC et al
| Amanda Wheeler |
| Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, Daryl Oestreich, Gurstel Law Firm, P.C. and Lawgistic Partners, LLC |
| 3:2019cv00016 |
| January 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance filed by Jeffrey E. Schelble for Counter Claimant Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC. (Schelble, Jeffrey) Modified on 3/8/2019. (lak) |
| Filing 11 Amended ANSWER by Defendants Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, Lawgistic Partners, LLC, Gurstel Law Firm P.C. and Daryl Oestreich, COUNTERCLAIM against Amanda Wheeler by Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC. (Jones, Charles) Modified on 3/4/2019. (lak) |
| Filing 10 Joint Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Lein, Matthew) Modified on 2/22/2019. (lak) |
| Set Telephone Conference: Telephone Pretrial Conference set for 3/14/2019 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5153. [#Standing Order Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (jat) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER by Defendants Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, Gurstel Law Firm, P.C., Lawgistic Partners, LLC, Daryl Oestreich. (Jones, Charles) |
Filing 8
** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER accepting and granting #7 Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/5/19. (jat)
|
| Filing 7 Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer by Plaintiff Amanda Wheeler, (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Lein, Matthew) Modified on 2/5/2019. (lak) |
| Reset Deadlines: Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC answer due 2/11/2019; Gurstel Law Firm, P.C. answer due 2/11/2019; Lawgistic Partners, LLC answer due 2/11/2019. (jat) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Charles E. Jones for Defendants Lawgistic Partners LLC, Daryl Oestreich. (Jones, Charles) Modified on 2/1/2019. (lak) |
| Filing 5 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. Gurstel Law Firm, P.C. served on 1/11/2019, answer due 2/1/2019. (Lein, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC served on 1/11/2019, answer due 2/1/2019. (Lein, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. Lawgistic Partners, LLC served on 1/15/2019, answer due 2/5/2019. (Lein, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, Gurstel Law Firm, P.C., Lawgistic Partners, LLC, Daryl Oestreich. (jat) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0758-2388234.), filed by Amanda Wheeler, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Service filed in State Court as to Daryl Oestreich, #2 Summons - Lawgistic Partners, LLC, #3 Summons - Gurstel Law Firm, PC, #4 Summons - Daryl Oestreich, #5 Summons - Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, #6 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lein, Matthew) Modified on 1/8/2019. (lak) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (jat) |
| Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (jat) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
