King, Christopher v. State of Wisconsin et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Wisconsin Western District King, Christopher v. State of Wisconsin et al

King, Christopher v. State of Wisconsin et al

Case Number:	3:2019cv00063
Filed:	January 23, 2019
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office:	Madison Office
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 27, 2020	Filing 79 ORDER that all pending motions to dismiss (dkts. 2 - 5 , 22 , 30 ) are GRANTED. The Litchfield defendants' motions to strike (dkts. 46 , 59 ) are DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 4/27/2020. (rks),(ps)
January 23, 2019	Filing 18 ORDER that 1) Attorney Johnson shall have until January 25, 2019, to address whether removal of the original action was timely. Plaintiffs may have seven days to respond. 2) Plaintiffs may have until January 25, 2019, to address whether defe ndants' removal is barred by their assertion of inadequate service. 3) The clerk's office is directed to SEVER the plaintiff's claims into three separate cases, with Rinaldi remaining the sole plaintiff in case no. 19-cv-3; Nora� 39;s case being assigned a new number and reassigned to a different judge; and King's case being assigned a new number. When new case numbers are formally assigned, the clerk's office shall promptly notify the affected parties. 4) When the clerk's office assigns new case numbers to the claims of Nora and King, the following entries should be imported to both cases: the notice of removal and its attachments (dkt. # 2 ), Litchfield Cavo's corporate disclosure statement (dk t. # 3 ), Wells Fargo's notice of consent to removal (dkt. # 4 ), Rice's notice of appearance (dkt. # 5 ), the OLR defendants' consent to removal (dkt. # 6 ), the motion to stay and for a status conference and the text-only order grant ing it (dkt. ## 7 - 8 ), the acknowledgement of receipt of the Dane County Circuit Court's record (dkt. # 9 ), the Jan. 18, 2019 unnumbered minute entry, and this order. Nora's motion to disqualify and associated filings (dkt. ## 10 - 13 , 16 ) and Nora's letter to Clerk Oppeneer (dkt. # 15 ) should be imported to her new case only. King's motion for reconsideration (dkt. # 17 ) should be imported to his new case only. 5) Rinaldi may have until February 1, 2019, to fi le an amended complaint detailing the claims he intends to pursue under this case number. 6) Should it so choose, Wells Fargo may have until January 25, 2019, to move to dismiss Rinaldi's case based on improper service of process. 7) Absen t perfection of service to their satisfaction, Rinaldi and King may have until February 1, 2019, to respond to the pending motion to dismiss filed by the Litchfield Cavo defendants. These defendants may have seven days to file a reply on this motion. 8) Wells Fargo may have until February 1 to respond to King's "notice of errata/60b motion." 9) The OLR defendants, the State of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roggensack, and the attorney general, those defe ndants may have until February 1 to answer, move or otherwise respond to the extent they have been adequately served 10) The previous deadlines apply in Nora's severed case pending reassignment to a new judge. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 1/22/2019. (jef),(ps)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 27, 2020

Filing 79 ORDER that all pending motions to dismiss (dkts. 2 - 5 , 22 , 30 ) are GRANTED. The Litchfield defendants' motions to strike (dkts. 46 , 59 ) are DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 4/27/2020. (rks),(ps)

January 23, 2019

Filing 18 ORDER that 1) Attorney Johnson shall have until January 25, 2019, to address whether removal of the original action was timely. Plaintiffs may have seven days to respond. 2) Plaintiffs may have until January 25, 2019, to address whether defe ndants' removal is barred by their assertion of inadequate service. 3) The clerk's office is directed to SEVER the plaintiff's claims into three separate cases, with Rinaldi remaining the sole plaintiff in case no. 19-cv-3; Nora� 39;s case being assigned a new number and reassigned to a different judge; and King's case being assigned a new number. When new case numbers are formally assigned, the clerk's office shall promptly notify the affected parties. 4) When the clerk's office assigns new case numbers to the claims of Nora and King, the following entries should be imported to both cases: the notice of removal and its attachments (dkt. # 2 ), Litchfield Cavo's corporate disclosure statement (dk t. # 3 ), Wells Fargo's notice of consent to removal (dkt. # 4 ), Rice's notice of appearance (dkt. # 5 ), the OLR defendants' consent to removal (dkt. # 6 ), the motion to stay and for a status conference and the text-only order grant ing it (dkt. ## 7 - 8 ), the acknowledgement of receipt of the Dane County Circuit Court's record (dkt. # 9 ), the Jan. 18, 2019 unnumbered minute entry, and this order. Nora's motion to disqualify and associated filings (dkt. ## 10 - 13 , 16 ) and Nora's letter to Clerk Oppeneer (dkt. # 15 ) should be imported to her new case only. King's motion for reconsideration (dkt. # 17 ) should be imported to his new case only. 5) Rinaldi may have until February 1, 2019, to fi le an amended complaint detailing the claims he intends to pursue under this case number. 6) Should it so choose, Wells Fargo may have until January 25, 2019, to move to dismiss Rinaldi's case based on improper service of process. 7) Absen t perfection of service to their satisfaction, Rinaldi and King may have until February 1, 2019, to respond to the pending motion to dismiss filed by the Litchfield Cavo defendants. These defendants may have seven days to file a reply on this motion. 8) Wells Fargo may have until February 1 to respond to King's "notice of errata/60b motion." 9) The OLR defendants, the State of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roggensack, and the attorney general, those defe ndants may have until February 1 to answer, move or otherwise respond to the extent they have been adequately served 10) The previous deadlines apply in Nora's severed case pending reassignment to a new judge. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 1/22/2019. (jef),(ps)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King, Christopher v. State of Wisconsin et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?