Winius, Michael v. Pawlak, Kristen et al
Michael Winius |
Jon E. Litscher, Captain Thomas Wiegan, Paul Kemper, Mark Heise, Kristen Pawlak, Dr. Lisa Buhs, Robin Diebold, Kristen L. Pawlak and Steven Johnson |
3:2019cv00160 |
February 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Barbara B Crabb |
Stephen L Crocker |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Combined Brief in Reply to #4 Motion to Remand to State Court, by Michael Winius and Brief in Opposition by Plaintiff Michael Winius re: #2 Motion to Transfer, filed by Thomas Wiegan, Lisa Buhs, Steven Johnson, Kristen L. Pawlak, Robin Diebold, Jon E. Litscher, Mark Heise, Paul Kemper. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter and Envelope) (nln),(ps) |
Filing 7 Brief in Opposition by Defendants Lisa Buhs, Robin Diebold, Mark Heise, Steven Johnson, Paul Kemper, Jon E. Litscher, Kristen L. Pawlak, Thomas Wiegan re: #4 Motion to Remand to State Court and Brief in Reply in Support of #2 Motion to Transfer to Eastern District of Wisconsin. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Paulson, Rebecca),(ps) Modified on 4/2/2019 (nln). |
Filing 6 Brief in Opposition by Plaintiff Michael Winius re: #2 Motion to Transfer. (rks),(ps) |
Filing 5 Affidavit of Michael T. Winius filed by Plaintiff Michael Winius re: #4 Motion to Remand and Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Notice of Removal to The United States District Court. (rks),(ps) |
Filing 4 MOTION TO REMAND and Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Notice of Removal to The United States District Court by Plaintiff Michael Winius. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-15 - Various documents related to Dane Co. Case No. 2018CV003054 (18-IP-0043), #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Cover Letter, #4 Envelope) (rks),(ps) |
Set Briefing Deadlines as to #4 MOTION TO REMAND and Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Notice of Removal to The United States District Court. Defendants' Brief in Opposition due 4/3/2019. Plaintiff's Brief in Reply due 4/15/2019. (rks),(ps) |
Filing 3 Record from Circuit Court of Dane County. (Attachments: #1 Docket sheet) (jef),(ps) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/21/2019: #2 Dane County Case 18CV3054 Record) (rks). |
Filing 2 MOTION TO TRANSFER to Eastern District of Wisconsin by Defendants Lisa Buhs, Robin Diebold, Mark Heise, Steven Johnson, Paul Kemper, Jon E. Litscher, Kristen L. Pawlak, Thomas Wiegan. (Attachments: #1 Judicial Caseload Profile, #2 Certificate of Service) (Paulson, Rebecca),(ps) Modified on 3/1/2019: Missing paragraph 5. (lak) |
Prisoner Litigation Reform Act Screening. (rks),(ps) |
Set Deadlines as to #2 MOTION TO TRANSFER to Eastern District of Wisconsin . Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition due 3/14/2019. Defendants' Brief in Reply due 3/21/2019. (rks),(ps) |
Judge update in case. Case randomly assigned to District Judge Barbara B. Crabb. (rks),(ps) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Dane County Circuit Court, case number 18CV3054, ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0758-2417296), filed by Paul Kemper, Kristen Pawlak, Mark Heise, Jon E. Litscher, Robin Diebold, Lisa Buhs, Thomas Wiegan, Steven Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Summons and Complaint and Exhibits, #2 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certificate of Service) (Paulson, Rebecca),(ps) Modified on 2/28/2019. (lak) Modified on 2/28/2019 (jef). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.