Taylor, George v. Mashack et al
Case Number: 3:2019cv00299
Filed: April 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 117 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants dismissing the case with prejudice. (rks),(ps)
April 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER that Plaintiff George Taylor's motion for reconsideration regarding the dismissal of his Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Dale Paul and Denise Valerius, Dkt. 83 , is DENIED. Taylor's motion for reconsideration regarding the dismissal of his state-law negligence claims against defendants Valerius, Salam Syed, and Trisha Anderson, Dkt. 85 , is GRANTED. The deadline for dispositive motions is now June 1, 2020. Taylor's motions to amend his complaint, Dkt. 86 ; Dkt. 89 ; and Dkt. 94 ; are DENIED. Taylor's motion to extend the deadline for dispositive motions, Dkt. 91 , is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 4/22/2020. (rks),(ps)
March 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER that Defendants' motion to dismiss and for summary judgment in part, Dkt. 44 , is GRANTED. Plaintiff George Taylor's Wisconsin-law negligence claims against defendants Syed, Doehling, Anderson, Valerius, and Paul are DISMISSED wit hout prejudice for Taylor's failure to comply with Wisconsin's notice-of-claim statute. Taylor's Eighth Amendment claims against Valerius, Doehling, and Paul are DISMISSED without prejudice for Taylor's failure to exhaust his admi nistrative remedies. Taylor's motion to amend his complaint, Dkt. 67 , is DENIED. Taylor's motions for preliminary injunctions, Dkts. 62 , 67 , and 72 , are DENIED. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 3/10/2020. (rks),(ps)
September 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER that plaintiff George Taylor's motion for preliminary injunctive relief, Dkt. 6 , is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 9/23/2019. (rks),(ps)
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER that defendants have until September 13, 2019, to supplement their answer with responses to plaintiff George Taylor's allegations against defendant Paul, Dkt. 15 , and to submit a declaration stating whether Taylor may order shoes from outside vendors in excess of the Department of Corrections' $75 limit as specified in Taylor's November 15, 2018 Special Handling Summary, Dkt. 9 -1, at 35. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 9/6/2019. (jef),(ps)
June 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER granting plaintiff George Taylor leave to proceed against defendant Paul. The attorney general's office may have until July 9, 2019, to inform the court whether it accepts service on behalf of Paul. The operative pleading is Taylor's original complaint, Dkt. 1 , as supplemented by Taylor's additional statement of facts, Dkt. 15 . Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 6/25/2019. (jef),(ps)
April 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff George Taylor assessed an initial partial filing fee of $67.65 due 5/10/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 4/18/2019. (nln),(ps)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor, George v. Mashack et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?